The rest of this post will go through the different ways VDTs can be used and visualised. To interact with the VDTs, please download the Excel workbook here.
Benefit Realisation VDT
Benefits Realisation VDTs can be built from Benefits Dependency Networks. A Benefits Dependency Network diagram (as above) shows the inter-relationships between enablers, business changes, benefits and investment objectives.
At it most fundamental level, the purpose of a benefit dependency network diagram is to ensure that you don’t double count benefits from interrelated improvements or investments you make to an organisation.
A Benefits Realisation VDT can quantify the benefit as well as show the relationship between the business benefits, operational assumptions and the investment objectives. The matching colours between the above diagrams show where these common elements are.
Revenue VDTs show the flow of value through the primary activities of an organisation. This model constrains the flow of value based on key inputs. These constraints can show us where improvements could contribute additional value to the organisation. This is an overly simplistic VDT but shows you the basics of what a revenue VDT can do.
Similar to a Revenue VDT, a cost VDT can use the same inputs to determine what the cost will be to an organisation. This VDT splits costs between fixed and variable. The variable costs are driven by the same input assumptions as the revenue model.
A profit VDT is a simple combination of the Revenue and Cost VDTs. This allows us to change a single input and see how this reflects on the overall value to the organisation. This shows the play off between improving productivity and the impact this also has on cost.
As an experiment, download the workbook and increase the number of employees working in the organisation from 14 to 15 (at cell O37). You might have assumed that having an additional employee might allow the organisation to create more value (in this case, gross profit). However, as you can see, the additional employee also increases the total cost of labour and without a corresponding increase in productivity for the manufacturing plant itself (see Total Production Input (L) at cell L24), the potential value from the new employee is wasted and you’ve reduced the organisation’s profitability by more than $100k.
A Financial VDT can be used to assess the financial performance of an organisation. For this example, we are measuring the Economic Value Added or EVA of an organisation. EVA is measure of whether a company is earning better than its cost of capital. These financial inputs can be changed to see how the impact on the EVA of the organisation. Here I have also plugged in some standard accounting ratios to show how you can track the financial performance at the same time.
The elements of a VDT can contain whatever information you wish them to. For a reporting VDT we can allocate people to be responsible for specific value drivers as well as show how their achievement is dependent on one another. Here we have cascaded KPIs through the organisational hierarchy to specific individuals. We can report on the status on how they are impacting the creation of value.
For example, in the diagram below, you can see that Susan Grace is doing well by keeping the average cost per employee down, but Luke King is affecting value overall because the average shift is greater than 8 hours. Without this level of detail, you might have only known that Margaret Gold’s KPI was on track and not seen the underlying issue of an overworked workforce.
A table VDT contains the same mathematical logic as a VDT however, since it is in a table form, we are able to easily show information over time. In this instance we are using it to measure changes in planned performance. By incorporating time you can analyse seasonable trends or forecast future production.
If this table was to be represented as a diagram, it would look like the VDT below.
This final example of a VDT shows the flexibility that VDTs have in presenting and calculating value. In this instance, we are showing the change in value drivers over time. For example, we see that variable costs increased around the same time as production costs. We could hypothesis that, when production increases, economies of scale should see a decrease in costs. So we could focus on this area for investigation
The table VDT above, can then be visualised as a diagram as below.